(201) 546-5195 is a Robocall
Be cautious.
- Listen
- Transcript Hello.
- Date Blocked
- Call Activity Low Last detected 4 days ago

Just last week, 8,279 people got Nomorobo protection!

it helps but the fact that my phone still rings once can be annoying late at night. Also MANY calls are still coming thru> The stupid cable company ( Time Warner) ALLOWS unidentified calls even tho I have blocked them as they consider " name unavailable" to be an identity!!!!!thnx for all you are doing to try to knock off this nonsense! I did not have this kind of trouble with phone calls until we switched to Time Warner!! and yet we pay $2 to be unlisted..... what a waste!
— Barbara, Nov 29th, 10:20am
What can I say? This is the best deal in a long time. It really works and am so grateful that I hear one ring, and no more. If anyone doubts this program, please get your friends, neighbors to sign up. Thank you so much for this program. I have gotten my friends to sign up. They love it
— Barbara, Nov 29th, 10:39am
Thank you Mr Foss for creating this technology, I' m now the master of my domain/castle! After returning home from a stressful job I look forward to my quiet and peaceful environment without intrusive robo callers invading my personal space!
— CG A, Nov 29th, 11:17am
I think it is great.I get just 1 ring no message left on my answering machine,look up the sender on my caller ID, and know it was a robocall.
— Anthony G, Nov 29th, 12:01pm

i have noticed a BIG drop in the robocalls. What a relief.
— Joan N, Nov 29th, 12:13pm
This is a great App that everyone who hate robo calls should have. In fact, this should be standard feature on all phones and if anyone crazy enough to want robo calls, they could deselect the feature. The App could use a feature that would allow a "blacklist" to block unwanted calls.
— Sho Y, Nov 29th, 2:39pm
One of the best tech developments ever!
— Thomas G, Nov 29th, 2:59pm
Very impressed. I often check to see if Nomorobo has incorrectly blocked personal calls which I would want to receive. It never does this: it seems to have 100% accuracy.
— Robert, Nov 29th, 3:19pm