(512) 852-8595 is a Robocall
Be cautious.
- Listen
- Transcript Hello? Hey, can you hear me?
- Date Blocked
- Call Activity Low Last detected 2 weeks ago
Just last week, 8,252 people got Nomorobo protection!
It's great, it blocks around 4 robo calls a day
— John H, Nov 29th, 9:20amIt's amazing and we are so pleased to have this service. THANK YOU!
— D. S, Nov 29th, 9:43amThank you for your wonderful invention, and for your much appreciated phone scam alerts!! Finally- a company we can rely on for great service!Now, if only you could prevent even that first ring from the scammers, that would truly be remarkable!!
— LR, Nov 29th, 10:13amThis is a service of the telephone company, right? They provide the phone service and they are the ones to ensure they are used properly, right?No?The telephone company doesn't care if their service is used by scammers and annoying callers?They provide a Caller ID so we can decide if we want to accept the call? But only if we go to the phone and examine the caller and number? We still gotta go to the phone, right? Why can't somebody just intersept those calls and stop the ringing?Somebody did?! And it wasn't the phone company?An independent service? And it's free?THANKS! Nomorobo! You enhanced our quality of life and for bringing peace to so many >>> you should receive the Nobel Peace Prize.
— Michael, Nov 29th, 10:51amAbsolute peace
— Linda, Nov 29th, 11:07amI love Nomorobo. The phone rings once, then the phone-bot is sent to never-never land. Yahoo. Thanks for this great service.
— William, Nov 29th, 11:50amIts....grrrreat!
— Tom, Nov 29th, 12:24pmI loved it at the start and recommended it to everyone. However, about a while ago, calls started leaking through. I contacted you and was advised to notify you listing the names callers were using. I did that for a while, but the leak got even heavier and the same robo callers kept changing their names. I've more or less given up on nomorobo. If you tell me you've solved the leak problem, I'd consider it, but right now, I doubt your effectiveness.
— Ivan S, Nov 29th, 1:20pm