(914) 820-2270 is a Fake Lottery/Sweepstakes Robocall
Be cautious.
- Listen
- Transcript 516-861-9295. This is a call from the PCH company. We are calling you because you have selected has the big, big sweepstakes winner. This call is very important for you so you need to call us back at the Publishers Clearinghouse Company at 516-861-9295 for more information. This is a call from the PCH company. We are calling you because you have selected as the big, big sweepstakes winner. This call is very important for you so you need to call us back at the Publishers Clearinghouse Company at 516-86-1929 for more information. Call us back at five one.
- Date Blocked
- Call Activity Low Last detected 1 year ago
Just last week, 8,272 people got Nomorobo protection!
It works well to bad it did not pick up election calls. There are also donation calls that slip through. Over all I would not ant to give it up.
— Blaise, Nov 29th, 9:11amRobocall has given me some peace
— Rodney, Nov 29th, 9:14amI am still getting unwanted phone calls really can`t tell I have Nomorobo !
— Twila S, Nov 29th, 9:40amIt seems that you catch at least one call a day for us. Good job and Thank You!
— Bob, Nov 29th, 10:19amNomorobo has made my life so much less stressful! Thank you from the bottom of my heart.
— Elizabeth S, Nov 29th, 10:36amFantastic! My phone has numerous single rings daily as Nomorobo kills them. Suggestion: During the next election cycle can we block the surveys, get out the vote and money requests?
— Ward G, Nov 29th, 10:58amOne of the great joys of my day is hearing the phone ring once and knowing that Nomorobo has sent the unwanted seller (aren't they ALWAYS selling something?) on its merry way. Three cheers for this great idea.
— Betty, Nov 29th, 10:59amI had been waiting for a long time for someone to step up and provide a solution to stopping all the annoying robo and scam calls I have been receiving. I even had to buy a new phone with a larger blocking capability. I don't understand why our carriers did not step up to eliminate this problem. Thanks for offering an alternative solution. It's been working great.
— Howard B, Nov 29th, 11:32am